There are many people, whether they claim to be religious or not, who think that ethics are artificial because they associate them with the superstition of fundamentalism. Ethics are lost when the religious paradigm that declares them crosses a certain line of reason. It is very frustrating for many thoughtful and reasonable practitioners of Judeo-Christian spirituality to have their good work continually co-opted by fundamentalists and religious profiteers...
The great Immanuel Kant proved, with arduous detail and logic, that all arguments for the demonstration of the existence of God are flawed. But all arguments against the existence of God are equally as flawed. All of the reasoning he used can still be refined to the simple statement: one cannot know the unknowable by definition. The insight that religious truth (the existence of God, the existence of an eternal soul, etc.) lies outside the realm of possible experience is extremely important. For although we can empirically determine grotesque violations of moral decency by the standard of hypocrisy, it is the unattainable absolute truth about the spirit of “All” that ultimately determines moral truth. So “that which” is unattainable is the most important of all things.
...Intolerance is the ultimate ungodliness because it denies all God, denies all morality, and denies all reason. It is an absolute, undisputable fact that one cannot claim exclusivity of their creed or be intolerant in any way and also claim to be religious within any sense of the word, because they have rejected the unknown.